similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to alpha-lee.com

Alpha Lee alternatives & similar sites

Dr Alpha Lee | Univeristy of Cambridge — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cusap.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Students Against Pseudoscience – Based at the University of Cambridge	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
globalwaterfutures.ca ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Global Water Futures \| University of Saskatchewan	Canada en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
discoveroceanography.co.uk ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Discover Oceanography \| University of Southampton	United Kingdom en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hannahpicton.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Hannah Picton – PhD Student at the University of Edinburgh	United Kingdom en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demalphazeta.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home \| DEM Alpha Zeta	en	science Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccc-lab.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CAMBRIDGE CONSCIOUSNESS & COGNITION - home	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bridger7.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home \| BRIDGER 7	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
treyboone.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Trey Boone – Assistant Professor \| Department of Philosophy \| University of Virginia	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bridge8.com.au ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bridge8	Australia en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
presttun.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	A New Understanding of the Universe	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonfsoubeyrand.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Simon Faghel-Soubeyrand. Banting Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Oxford.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lawrencehallofscience.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Lawrence Hall of Science – The public science center of the University of California, Berkeley.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csilabs.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Caltech-Cambridge Climate and Social Intelligence Lab	en	science Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brodiemangan.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Brodie Mangan \| Cognitive Psychologist/Neuroscientist, University of Stirling	United Kingdom~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brandonboor.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Boor Lab at Purdue University	United States~ en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lcrossey.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Laura J. Crossey – Distinguished Professor, Earth & Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neurocenter-unige.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Geneva University Neurocenter	Switzerland en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kansaiuniversityreports.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Technology Reports of Kansai University \| TRKU	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.