similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to allisonhui.com

Allisonhui alternatives & similar sites

Dr. Allison Hui | Lecturer in Sociology, Lancaster University — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
mdxmindsblog.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Middlesex University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cu-aa.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Columbia University Africa Alumni \| CU-AA	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertmatz.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Robert Matz – George Mason University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jenniferdbrooks.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Jennifer Brooks, PhD \| Cornell University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brandeeeaster.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Brandee Easter \| Digital rhetoric – Digital Rhetoric & Writing \| York University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meghanoneil.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Meghan M. O’Neil, PhD – Michigan State University	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csualum.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alumni Association \| Colorado State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csualum.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alumni Association \| Colorado State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rlanders.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Richard N. Landers, I/O Psychologist @ University of Minnesota (TNTLAB)	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rodrigozamith.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Rodrigo Zamith, Associate Professor, University of Massachusetts Amherst	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
badchickuniversity.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	BAD CHICK UNIVERSITY - Home	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsai humans	emailphone	none
aau.edu ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Association of American Universities (AAU)	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anarchist.university ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Anarchist University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thelaurelsbu.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Laurel – St. Bonaventure University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jdscai.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Southmayd Center for American Ideals \| Washington & Lee University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thegeekwave.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	The Geekwave - University of Utah	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thekillernashvillenetwork.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Killer Nashville University \| Learn, Grow, and Elevate Your Writing	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
guvipevents.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Greenville University & Liberty Dogs Partnership	en	education	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.