similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to alinaspera.com

Alinaspera alternatives & similar sites

Alina Spera — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jessicawalshconservation.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Jessica Walsh \| Conservation Decisions Research	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thekatzlab.com ↗	61 match 3 shared topics	Home	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaylabucla.org ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	JAYLab UCLA – Environmental Research Lab	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jenniferlynnhoward.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Jenny McKee \| Movement Ecologist & Science Writer	en	environment Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qecology.org ↗	44 match 2 shared topics	Qiang He \| QECOLOGY	en	environment Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcglinnlab.org ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	McGlinn lab	United States~ en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nextgenenvirolab.com ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	Home \| NEXT-GEN Environment Science Laboratory Environmental Laboratory & Research Solutions	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
queerbioanth.org ↗	43 match 2 shared topics	Queer BioAnth – Supporting LGBTQQIAA researchers in biological anthropology	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasperwubs.net ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Jasper Wubs - Soil & Agro Ecologist	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bmolbio.org ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Journal Home:: Biochemistry and Molecular Biology:: Science Publishing Group	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tsievert.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Thorbjörn Sievert: Education	en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vernier.org ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Electrobionics - Electronics in Biology; Biology in Electronics	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pyrola.org ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Jolles Lab – natural history and evolution of species complexes	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
plantenergy.edu.au ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Home	Australia en	biological-sciences	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gumadeiras.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	gustavo madeira santana - Gustavo Madeira Santana	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
robertlanza.com ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Robert Lanza	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
10insightsclimate.science ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Essential research findings to support decision-making in a critical decade - 10insightsclimate	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meeg.org ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	Marine Evolutionary Ecology Group – Professor Dustin Marshall’s research lab, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia	en	biological-sciences WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.