similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to alignsweden.com

Alignsweden alternatives & similar sites

ALIGN | För professionell AI i Sverige — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
botlas.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Botlas — AI-drivna chatbottar för företag	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dropworks.ai ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Dropworks — AI Demand Planning för Modeindustrin	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
4reconciliation.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	4Reconciliation — AI-audit för beslutsfattare	Sweden~ sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boostly.digital ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Boostly – Digital Workplace Development \| Microsoft 365 & AI	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
twinaigency.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	AI-twins och ai avatars	sv	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bitcoinderby.live ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Bitcoin Derby	sv	artificial-intelligence Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qlia.ai ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Qlia — Intelligence Redefined	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nicoleboman.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Nicole Boman — Översättare mellan teknik & människa	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jesperknutsson.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	jesperknutsson.com – Science, economy and sustainability	sv	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aamos.ai ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	AAMOS — Evidence Engine	sv	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theonlymanual.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	TOM — The Only Manual	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bobs.company ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Bobs Company — Vi AI aktiverar företag på 72 timmar	sv	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryvanta.io ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Cryvanta — Custom System Builds (and pentest on top)	sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vendr.ai ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	VENDR.AI – AI for SME	sv	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
acutveckling.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	AC Utveckling – Vi bygger plattformar, appar & AI-lösningar	sv	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
therilly.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Sänk värmepumpens elkostnad med AI \| Therilly	sv	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aducera.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	Beetroot \| Skräddarsydd mjukvaruutveckling och AI-lösningar	sv	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kvkonsult.com ↗	30 match 1 shared topics	KV Konsult – AI-utbildning, AI-strategi & digitala lösningar	Sweden~ sv	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.