similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to alanseng.de

Alanseng alternatives & similar sites

Alan Seng – Communication designer based in Germany — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
a-umi.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	u&mi – visual communication	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jannawinkler.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	janna winkler – Multidisciplinary designer based in Berlin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ab88.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Anne Brüstel. Graphic designer based in Leipzig.	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
noe.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hannah Rauß – Portfolio – Visual Communcation Designer – Hamburg	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
foreground.ch ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	foreground communication GmbH	Switzerland de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
johannohess.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	JOHANNO HESS DESIGN \| GRAPHIC DESIGN – SPATIAL COMMUNICATION	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johannohessdesign.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	JOHANNO HESS DESIGN \| GRAPHIC DESIGN – SPATIAL COMMUNICATION	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johannes-schwaderer.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Johannes Schwaderer – Freelance Senior UX-Designer based in Berlin	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
julian-juretko.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Julian Juretko – Kommunikationsdesigner B.A.	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathan-auch.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Studio Jonathan Auch — Visual Communication — Graphic Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abarnett.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	abarnett – Kommunikationsdesignerin	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josephine-sprung.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Josephine Sprung – Kommunikationsdesign	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elisabethstrass.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Elisabeth Straß – Interaction Designer	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abracradama.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	abracradama - visual communication	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2ax.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	\| ax. kommunikation + design	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonasheidenreich.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Jonas Heidenreich – Kommunikationsdesigner	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ch-keichel.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Christiane Keichel – Kommunikation & Design	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
k-2.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	K2 Fachbüro für Kommunikation & Design – Start	Germany de	design Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.