similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to aimeeshack.com

Aimeeshack alternatives & similar sites

Techsponential learning – Mathematics and technology teaching and learning — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Online Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ctcentrepreneur.com ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	CTC entrepreneurship – teaching entrepreneurship to students on the alternate curriculum	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100foldlearning.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	100 FOLD LEARNING – 100 fold learning	en	online-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
directedlearning.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Directed Learning - Directed Learning	en	education WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skill-ed.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Skill-Ed	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owlanguage.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home	United States~ en	online-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cttl.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Current Trends in Translation Teaching and Learning E (CTTL E) ISSN 2342-7205 - CTTL E 2026	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thrived360.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	ThrivEd360 – Learning and growing together	en	online-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wazzanmath.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	wazzanMath Learning Lab – Math Experts	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
123learninganywhere.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	123 Learning Anywhere	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wayfarerslearningcenter.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Wayfarers Learning Center LLC – A safe haven for every learning journey.	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
galaxiapall.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Gx learning – Gx Case study	en	online-education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adlard.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Academy of Digital Learning and Research Development	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
masterfullearningcenter.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Masterful Learning Center	United States~ en	online-education	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
meebook.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Meebook — The intuitive learning platform (LMS) for teaching	en	online-education Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agencyofdreams.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Course Theme - Home Page	en	online-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalliteracies.blog ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Digital Literacies – Literacy and Learning in Digitally Connected Worlds.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4weekstoread.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	4 Weeks To Read System \| Learning Dynamics	en	online-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaeinrstats.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Learning Data – Advance Stats & Analytics at USF	en	online-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.