similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to adlips.design

Adlips alternatives & similar sites

Designagentur Dortmund – Brand Identity & Creative Direction – A.DB — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
samuel-goerzen.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	SAMUEL GÖRZEN – Art Direction + Brand Identity	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanelpelko.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Creative Director und Designer in Köln – Sanel Pelko	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
espacioblanco.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Espacioblanco – Corporate Identity & Brand Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ballmannweber.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Strategische, interdisziplinäre Designagentur – Ballmann Weber	de	design Craft CMS	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elenaknittelfelder.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Elena Maria Knittelfelder \| Illustration + Creative Direction \| Freelance Berlin	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
finenotfine.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	finenotfine Studio – Design, Branding und Art Direction	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
evabeham.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	eva beham - Art Direction und Kommunikationsdesign	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corneliawenk.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Art Direction \| Brand Design \| Packaging Design	de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
re-fresh.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Ferkaran de la Jara - Design & Creative Direction - München	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomaswiegand.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Thomas Wiegand – Freelance Art- & Creative Director	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
easydesign-solution.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	EASYDESIGN-SOLUTION \| Designagentur	Germany de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rainerhodde.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Creative- & Art Direction \| Rainer Hodde	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corinnapfu.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	NIO design studio – Branding & Grafikdesign	Austria~ de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rawvelvet.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - raw velvet · Design- und Kreativagentur \| Augsburg	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
raw-velvet.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Startseite - raw velvet · Design- und Kreativagentur \| Augsburg	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreaskonrad.ch ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	andreas konrad \| Art Direction und Multimedia-Design	Switzerland de	design Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
ringkamp-design.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	RINGKAMP DESIGN, die Designagentur aus Hannover-Linden	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
elenasiebecke.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Elena Siebecke \| Identity & Design	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.