similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to adept.work

Adept alternatives & similar sites

Hi! It's Ryan — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
renkoya.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ren Koya	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mja00.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	My Dumping Grounds	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
embracingtherandom.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Embracing the Random	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gara.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| gara.dev	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mjb.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Moritz Bauer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
benmaizes.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ben Maizes' Site!	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meghajain.me ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Megha's Personal Website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mixed-signals.ai ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Next.js Portfolio Starter	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debojitsantra.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Debojit Santra	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bendemaj.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ben Demaj	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deartechdiary.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dear Tech Diary, \| Relax, this is rocket science.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kermanx.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Hi there \| _Kerman	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fsnyman.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Frikkie Snyman	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dobb.ae ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dobbyns on Data	United Arab Emirates en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deananand.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Anand Anandalingam – Personal Web Site – This site captures and publishes the blogs, writings and presentations of Professor Anand Anandalingam	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mccraw.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	It's McCraw not McGraw	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mccraw.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	It's McCraw not McGraw	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cult-of-tech.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Cult of Tech.net - What? This is suppose to be witty?	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.