similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to adala-ev.de

Adala Ev alternatives & similar sites

Adala e.V. – Mit Recht gegen Rassismus — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Civic Affairs →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
gegenflutlicht.at ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Gegen Flutlicht	Austria de	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gggk.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Gemeinsam gegen Gewalt Kilchberg	Switzerland de	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meinestunde.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home – Meine Stunde für Wuppertal	de	civic-affairs TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buerger-liste.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Wir für WÖST – Home	Austria de	civic-affairs Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gemeindebund-burgenland.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Gemeindebund Burgenland – Interessensvertretung der burgenländischen Gemeinden gegenüber Land und Bund	Austria de	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agrar-info.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Agrar Info – Agrar Info	Austria de	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
buergerbeirat-gartenau.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Das Mediationsverfahren mit Erfolgsgeschichte – seit 1996 - BürgerBeirat Gartenau	Austria de	civic-affairs Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chstiftung.ch ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home – ch Stiftung für eidgenössische Zusammenarbeit	Switzerland de	civic-affairs TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
badloipersdorf.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Bad Loipersdorf – Wikipedia	Austria de	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mekom.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Verein Bürgernetz Münster e.V.	de	civic-affairs	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bbr-badradkersburg.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BBR Bad Radkersburg – Bürgerliste für Transparenz & Mitbestimmung	Austria de	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
augustinerwald.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Augustinerwald – Siedlerverein	Austria de	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blik-krenglbach.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BLiK – Bürgerliste Krenglbach	Austria de	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simon-haas.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Simon Haas – Das Haselbach-Blog	de	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gemeinde-unnergoms.ch ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Gemeinde Unnergoms – Gemeinde Lax	Switzerland de	civic-affairs WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
altach.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Gemeinde Altach – Gemeinde Altach	Austria de	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
wirap.at ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	WIR mit AP – Stark, Zielbewusst, Motiviert, Zukunftsorientiert, Unparteiisch und Uneigennützig für Westendorf	Austria de	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brunohofer.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Audio – Bruno Hofer Kommunalmanagement	de	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.