similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to accessify.blog

Accessify alternatives & similar sites

Accessibility Standards and Checklist — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
access.kiwi ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Accessibility Kiwi	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessibility.engineer ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Accessibility engineer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessibility-bookmarklets.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Accessibility Bookmarklets	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
456bereastreet.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	456 Berea Street: Articles and news on web standards, accessibility, and usability	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessibility.design ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	San Francisco Accessibility Guide	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessibility.cool ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Home — Accessibility.cool	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a11y-101.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Introduction to Accessibility	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a11ymay.club ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	30 day accessibility email challenge	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
blazardesign.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Accessibility as a subscription \| Bogdan Lazar	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inclurev.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	AccessibilityFirst — Digital Accessibility Services	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lylehmann.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Lukas Yair Lehmann \| UX Designer & Accessibility Engineer	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinhat.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Thinhat \| Web Design Agency Cyprus & Accessibility Experts	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
includesco.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Includesco – Accessibility, Inclusive Research, UX	en	web-design-and-html WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inclusense.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Accessibility Widget for ADA, WCAG & EAA Compliance \| Inclusense	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
incluzive.app ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Incluzive Web Accessibility Widget \| Make web accessible for all	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accessibilitywidget.online ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Accesibilidad	en	web-design-and-html	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
24a11y.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	24 Accessibility - 24 days of accessibility gifts during the season of giving and sharing	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inclusiefontwerp.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Toegankelijk Webdesign volgens WCAG Standards \| Nederland	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.