similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to abundant.security

Abundant alternatives & similar sites

Abundant: Exposure Remediation — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
360privacy.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Digital Exposure Reduction - 360 Privacy	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
splintersec.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	SplinterSec EC - Passive Exposure Checker	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
leaktraces.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	LeakTraces — Digital Exposure Intelligence	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leakhunterai.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	LeakHunter AI - Dark Web Exposure Detection API	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anubi.pro ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Anubi Foundation	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leakguard.ai ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	LeakGuard - Credential Exposure Monitoring	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
armorcode.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ArmorCode: Remediate Less. Reduce Risk Faster.	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctem.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Open Taxonomy for Continuous Threat Exposure Management \| CTEM.org	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leaklens.app ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	IGotYou — Swiss-Army Knife for Web Recon & Exposure (Beta)	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apnic.foundation ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - APNIC Foundation	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
awingu.vlaanderen ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Secure Remote Workspace \| Parallels	en	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awingu.tv ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Secure Remote Workspace \| Parallels	en	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awingu.mobi ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Secure Remote Workspace \| Parallels	en	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awingu.club ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Secure Remote Workspace \| Parallels	en	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
awingu.brussels ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Secure Remote Workspace \| Parallels	en	information-and-network-security TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediaguard.ong ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Programs \| P Foundation	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
macsmedia.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	MacsMedia	en	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cloakr.app ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Cloakr.app: The Reputation Firewall	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.