Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI Report

Sites similar to abcproofreading.co.uk

Abcproofreading alternatives & similar sites

Book Editor | UK Proofreading and Editing Services — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
cbeditorial.com 78 match
1 shared topics
Carrie Bell Editorial | Professional Editing & Proofreading Services en publishing-industryWix robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
publishmojo.com 78 match
1 shared topics
EDITMOJO Editors | Book Editing and Formatting Services en publishing-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
cavanaugheditorial.com 75 match
1 shared topics
Cavanaugh Editorial Services: freelance copyediting and proofreading edit manuscripts editor proofread textbook publish en publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
nekediting.com 74 match
1 shared topics
NEK Editing | Book Editing and Interior Formatting Services en publishing-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
essexediting.org 74 match
1 shared topics
Essex Editing Services en publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
academicproofreadingservices.co.uk 74 match
1 shared topics
Best Academic Proofreading Services in the UK United Kingdom en publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
prsediting.com 74 match
1 shared topics
Paper Editing - Proofreading Services - Expert Paper Editors - Paper Editing Services en publishing-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
alexjgardner.co.uk 74 match
1 shared topics
Alex J. Gardner – Editorial & Book Design Services – Proofreading, copy editing and formatting for authors United Kingdom en publishing-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
esmarket.org 72 match
1 shared topics
ESMarket - Professional Book & Text Editing Services United States~ en publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
medicaleditor.eu 72 match
1 shared topics
Medical Editor - English Editing and Proofreading for Medical Researchers European Union en publishing-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
myscholarhub.org 71 match
1 shared topics
My Scholar Hub : Proofreading, Editing, and Translation Services en publishing-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
blurb.com 70 match
1 shared topics
Custom Book Printing - Professional Book Printing Services | Blurb en publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
blurb.co.uk 70 match
1 shared topics
Custom Book Printing - Professional Book Printing Services | Blurb United Kingdom en publishing-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
alexmackenzie.uk 70 match
1 shared topics
Alex Mackenzie – developmental editing | copyediting | proofreading United Kingdom en publishing-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
australianbookwriters.com 69 match
1 shared topics
Book Publishing & Writing Services in Australia | Australian Book Writers en publishing-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
lmhimeseditorial.com 69 match
1 shared topics
LM HIMES EDITORIAL SERVICES - Home en publishing-industryWeebly robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
publishdigitally.com 69 match
1 shared topics
Publish Digitally | Publishing and Marketing Services United States~ en publishing-industryWordPressSpree Commerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
aje.com 69 match
1 shared topics
AJE: Academic Journal Editing Services | Paper Editing & Publication Support en publishing-industryPrismic robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.