similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to 3f.dk

3F alternatives & similar sites

3F fagforening og a-kasse - 3F — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
3f-fagforening.dk ↗	98 match 1 shared topics	3F fagforening og a-kasse - 3F	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abf-blommegrenen.dk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Om foreningen	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aalbaekparken.dk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ålbækparkens Grundejerforening	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aarhushf.dk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Aarhus Haandværkerforening – En aktiv forening	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aastrupparken.dk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Åstrupparkens Grundejerforening \| Åstrupparkens Grundejerforening	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creceafonden.dk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Velkommen til CRECEA Fonden	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aarhushjaelper.dk ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Forside - Aarhushjælper	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akademikerne.dk ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Akademikerne - Akademikerne	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bl.dk ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BL - Danmarks Almene Boliger	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bafaa.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	BAFAA \| Bekæmp Fattigdom & Analfabetisme \| Dansk NGO	da	non-profit-organizations Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 13
crossingborders.dk ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Crossing Borders	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lokalting.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	LOKAL	da	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
corselitze.dk ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Forside - Corselitze	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
humanisten.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Humanisten – Filantropi online: Skab gode forandringer i verden.	da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dacg.dk ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	DACG \| Danish Anti-Counterfeiting Group	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baggersorensenfonden.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Velkommen til Bagger-Sørensen Fonden	da	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
aalborgstiftstidendesfond.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Forside \| Aalborg Stiftstidendes Fond	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cowifonden.dk ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Engaged ownership makes a difference	Denmark da	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.