similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to 1920-30.com

1920 30 alternatives & similar sites

The 1920s - Also known as the Roaring Twenties — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in History →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
gaspeevr.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Burning the Gaspee VR \|	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
10-facts-about.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	10 facts about - fun and interesting facts	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
howmanypeoplearethereintheworld.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	How many people are there in the world?	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voicingthepast.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Voicing the Past	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nationalflagfoundation.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	National Flag Foundation · Honoring the Flag of the United States	United States~ en	history	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
hotelhistoryexpert.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Hotel History Expert – Bringing the past to life	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
napoleon-series.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Napoleon Series	en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
livarva.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Livarva \| Library of the Roman Republic	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3rdmichiganinfantry.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The 3rd Michigan Infantry	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erika-jones.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Dr Erika Jones – Exploring the history of the Challenger Expedition (1872-1876), 19th-century science, and oceanography.	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cuimhneamh.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CUIMHNEAMH – Preserving the folklore and heritage of Southe Armagh and its people	en	history WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
how-to-history.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	How-to History – Instruction and information for historians. Into your inbox monthly.	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
navaldockyards.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Naval Dockyards Society \| Exploring the civil branches of navies & their material culture	en	history WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
protectingthepast.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Protecting the Past \| Protecting the Past	en	history Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
august1282.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	August 1282 - Celebrating the past...Embracing the future	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gatheringthevoices.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Holocaust Oral History Scotland \| Gathering the Voices	en	history WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
internationalflag.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Exploring the World of International Flags	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pulaskiclub.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Pulaski Club, Williamsburg, Virginia	en	history	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.