similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to voltawriter.com

Voltawriter alternatives & similar sites

Volta | The writing and publishing platform for literature — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
publishingprowess.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Publishing Prowess \| Writing & Publishing Support	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
lloydmoss.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Home - Lloyd Moss Editing and Publishing	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publixion.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Publixion - AI-Powered Publishing Platform	en	publishing-industry Gumroad	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
publishvote.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	BookVote - Democratic Publishing Platform	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pubgam.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	PubGam - Monetization platform for publishers	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publisherplus.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Publisher Plus - The multi-channel enterprise publishing platform	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
garuda-publishers.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Garuda Publishers \| Top self-publishing platform in India	en	publishing-industry Wix Wix Stores	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3toi.net ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Movable Type Publishing Platform	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voidcharter.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Publishing Platforms & Learning Systems \| Christopher Ross	Canada~ en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
australianbookwriters.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Book Publishing & Writing Services in Australia \| Australian Book Writers	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
authorsdreampublishing.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Leading Authors Dream Publishing \| Elevate Your Writing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
publishyou.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Publishing Central : Book Publishing Resources for authors and publishers.	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pugpig.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	The Mobile App Platform for Publishers & Media Brands \| Pugpig	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netmoreepaper.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Your ePaper Platform - Digital Publishing Made Easy	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publishdigitally.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Publish Digitally \| Publishing and Marketing Services	United States~ en	publishing-industry WordPress Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
publishingcoaches.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Book Publishing, Marketing and Sales Consultants	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aussiepublishinghouse.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Professional Book Writing, Editing & Publishing \| Aussie Publishing House	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
atmasutrapublishinghouse.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Atmasutra Publishing House	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.