similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to vishalsood.com

Vishalsood alternatives & similar sites

Vishal Sood — Enterprise AI & Content Operating Systems — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
squiz.io ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	The Content Operating System for the AI era \| Sanity	en	artificial-intelligence Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vishalsood.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Vishal Sood — Senior Research Engineer	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stackleader.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	StackLeader \| Modernize legacy enterprise systems for the AI era	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyclotronbuild.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Cyclotron Build \| Enterprise AI Engineering & Agent Development	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
erickshepherd.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Erick Shepherd — Enterprise Software Engineer · Oracle Ecosystems · AI-Assisted Tooling	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
viwr.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	VIWR – The operating system for creator marketing	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
budecosystem.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	BudEcosystem – End-to-end Enterprise GenAI Stack	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bugraptors.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Enterprise AI-Powered Software Testing Company- BugRaptors	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
viseyyon.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Viseyyon Technologies \| AI-Powered Enterprise Solutions	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctodiscovery.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	CTODiscovery \| AI Agents, Dev Tools & Enterprise Software Directory	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anshumansp.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Anshuman Parmar — AI Engineer, Content Creator & Entrepreneur	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anujaharsha.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Anuja Harsha Nimmagadda \| Senior Product Designer — Enterprise Products, Legacy Modernization, AI-Native	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
interactivetech.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	InteractiveTech — Practical AI, Data & Digital Systems	United Kingdom en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
omnitechnicus.ai ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	OmniTechnicus — AI systems, built then written down	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mchatbot.ai ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	mChatBot - Enterprise Multi‑Agent Chatbots Across Every Channel	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mechina.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	MishaMechina — Systems Portfolio	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daqstra.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Daqstra — Observability & Orchestration for Physical Systems	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helixrasystems.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Helixra Labs — AI Product Lab for Revenue Systems	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.