similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to v2techmem.com

V2Techmem alternatives & similar sites

OC STEM – Advancing Science, Technology, Engineering, Math — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
basef.net ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Bay Area Science and Engineering Fair – Infinite Possibilities	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hansonscience.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Hanson Science – Ask Why!	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnhfalk.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	John H. Falk – Ecology, Science Education, & Evolutionary Psychology	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctsciencefair.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Connecticut Science & Engineering Fair \| A non-profit Connecticut group that provides science recognition awards for students	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3escience.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	3E Science: Educate, Engage, Empower	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joannabehrman.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Joanna Behrman – Histories of Science, Gender, and Education	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dermisource.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Dermisource: Safety, Science, Success	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jordanys.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Jordan Young Scientist (JoYS)	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
devoutnone.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	DevoutNone – Promoting The Benefits of Science and Reason	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csrsef.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	CSRSEF Foundation - Supporting Science Education in Central Puget Sound	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bayareateenscience.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home - Bay Area Teen Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
faroutscience.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Far Out Science - New Server - Main - .	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
namrataguptablog.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Namrata Gupta – Academic Blog: Gender and STEM	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathanielgreely.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Nathaniel Greely – PhD Philosophy and Cognitive Science, UCSD, Adjunct Professor of Philosophy at California Lutheran University	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronmlien.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Aaron M. Lien – Social Ecological Systems Lab – Adapting to environmental and institutional change	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseyhenley.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Casey L Henley, PhD \| Neuroscience Educator at MSU	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lucbeaulieu.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Ruminating… \| Random thoughts about conducting scientific research, supervising students and «toys» that make creative activities even funnier…	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
journalcam.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Journal of Contemporary Applied Mathematics – Electronic ISSN: 3006-3183 Print ISSN: 2222-5498	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.