similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to uzsec.com

Uzsec alternatives & similar sites

UZSec - Professional Cybersecurity Services — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cybercert.pro ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	CyberCert.pro \| Professional Cybersecurity Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hassanahassan.com ↗	82 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Professional	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
santsec.com ↗	82 match 1 shared topics	Santsec Cybersecurity - Professional Cybersecurity Services	US~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybercrafters.tech ↗	81 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Services \| CyberCrafters	PK~ en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cyberstartus.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	SecureMyStack - Professional Cybersecurity Services \| Penetration Testing & Compliance	US~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hashenruwanpura.com ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	Hashen Ruwanpura - Cybersecurity Professional	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dedalo.com.ar ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	Dedalo - Cybersecurity Consulting	AR en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathanzachariah.com ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Tharian Zachariah \| Cybersecurity Professional	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jonathanayodele.com ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Ayodele \| Cybersecurity Professional	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandeeprajendiran.com ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	Sandeep Rajendiran - Cybersecurity Professional	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
assistsecurity.co.uk ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	Professional Security Services \| Assist Security	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cyberreaper.team ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	CyberReaper \| Cybersecurity Professional & Red Team Operator	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acylia.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Acylia \| Cybersecurity & Pentest	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zyntait.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Zynta IT \| Cybersecurity Services	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybersecurity4industry.org ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Services for Industry \| Secudea	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybersecurity4.industries ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity Services for Industry \| Secudea	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joelipinski.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Joe Lipinski - Cybersecurity Professional & Penetration Tester	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberdefendx.org ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	CyberDefendX \| Cybersecurity Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.