similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to uxakron.com

Uxakron alternatives & similar sites

UX Akron | A User Experience Community in Northeast Ohio — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
citycentercreatives.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Home Page	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
donorrecognitionwall.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Donor Recognition Wall \| Custom Donor Walls & Plaques \| Arreya Donor Walls	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
designs4dignity.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home - Designs for Dignity	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
traylorcreative.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Traylor Creative, Inc. \| design for small business, non-profits & churches	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eastolive.org ↗	40 match 1 shared topics	East Olive Community Center	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eastsidecommunityvaldosta.com ↗	39 match 1 shared topics	Eastside Community	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4friendsexp.org ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	4 Friends Experience -	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
claretianimpact.org ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Claretian Community Impact	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enrichingourcommunity.org ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enrichingourcommunity.net ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enrichingourcommunity.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Southeastern Illinois Community Foundation	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
africajam.org ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Africa Jam - Providing Hope, Unity, & Community in South Africa	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clevercheftable.org ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	The Clever Chef Table Community Foundation	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
enterprisecommunitypartners.org ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Enterprise Community Partners	en	non-profit-organizations Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bamcausa.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Bay Area Mongolian Community Association	en	non-profit-organizations Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heritagecf.org ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Renasant Community Foundation	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aiccny.org ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	The Allama Iqbal Community Center (AICC)	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
clearforkcommunityinstitute.com ↗	38 match 1 shared topics	Clearfork Community Institute - Home	en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.