similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to usrnetwork.org

Usrnetwork alternatives & similar sites

University Social Responsibility Network — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
studyportals-webster.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Webster University	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
talentfoundry.org.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Social mobility charity \| The Talent Foundry	GB en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csrngo.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Centre for Social Reconstruction	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mluwc.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	MLUWC - Montreal Lakeshore University Women's Club	en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
communitylearningnetwork.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CommUNITY Learning Network - Home	en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stonyplainyouthnetwork.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Stony Plain Youth Network	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abcjs.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Community Hub \| Japan Seattle ABC Network	US~ en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaaacoalition.net ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	JOIN US, a worldwide community of Universities and NGOs	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afscme3299.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	AFSCME 3299 – The University of California's Largest Employee Union!	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssgunc.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	CS + Social Good at UNC Chapel Hill	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afywlalumni.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Home - AfYWL Fellowship Programme alumni network	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adecsi.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	ADECSI – Asociacion, desarollo, EducativoY social de los Inmigrantes	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
desigualdades.net ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	desiguALdades.net - International Research Network on Interdependent Inequalities in Latin America: Homepage	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
communitychangeinc.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Community Change Inc. – Educating and Organizing for Racial Equity Since 1968	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aee.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Association for Experiential Education \| AEE	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
communityneedsinitiative.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Community Needs Initiative	en	non-profit-organizations Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
straycatkindnetwork.my ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	straycatkindnetwork.my – Non-profit organisation	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
streetpetsfriendsnetwork.my ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	streetpetsfriendsnetwork.my – Non-profit organisation	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.