similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to usemoka.com

Usemoka alternatives & similar sites

AI-Powered HR and Recruitment Software with ATS | Moka — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Human Resources →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
usemokahr.com ↗	100 match 2 shared topics	AI-Powered HR and Recruitment Software with ATS \| Moka	en	human-resources WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
urecruits.com ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	uRecruits \| AI Recruitment Software, ATS, Talent CRM & Hiring Platform	en	human-resources	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
useurecruits.com ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	uRecruits \| AI Recruitment Software, ATS, Talent CRM & Hiring Platform	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joinurecruits.com ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	uRecruits \| AI Recruitment Software, ATS, Talent CRM & Hiring Platform	en	human-resources	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joinrecruitbpm.com ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	Recruitment Software \| Hiring Software \| RecruitBPM	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
activatebeetweenpro.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Beetween - Online Recruitment Software	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joinselectsoftwarereviewshq.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	SelectSoftware Reviews - Reviews of The Best HR and Recruiting Software	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zyntrahire.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	ZyntraHire — Free ATS & Recruitment Software with WhatsApp AI \| India	en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
panther-software.co.uk ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Cutting Edge Temporary Recruitment Software \| Panther Software	GB en	human-resources	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oxford-software.co.uk ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Oxford Software \| Leading Suppliers of UK Recruitment Software	GB en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
oxfordsoftware.co.uk ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Oxford Software \| Leading Suppliers of UK Recruitment Software	GB en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdlapps.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Truck Driver Recruiting Management Software CDL Drivers	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
job-search-engine.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Text Recruiting Software \| Emissary.ai	en	human-resources HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jobsearchengine.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Text Recruiting Software \| Emissary.ai	en	human-resources HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
join.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Recruiting software & Applicant Tracking System \| JOIN	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
join-dev.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Recruiting software & Applicant Tracking System \| JOIN	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
join-hr.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Recruiting software & Applicant Tracking System \| JOIN	en	human-resources WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catsone.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Home - CATS Applicant Tracking System (ATS) & Recruiting Software	en	human-resources WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.