similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to usekeygraph.com

Usekeygraph alternatives & similar sites

Keygraph | Continuous Agentic Pentesting for the Enterprise — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
lumos.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Identity Management for the Agentic Era \| Lumos	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demandpath.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Sigil Browser — Secure Browser Agent for Enterprise	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xclaw.dev ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Local AI pentesting for security teams	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 7
usesansar.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	SANSAR \| Governance for Agentic AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sansarai.ai ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	SANSAR \| Governance for Agentic AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanwi.ai ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Sanwi — The Knowledge and Security Layer for the Agentic Era	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
usecascoai.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Autonomous Security Testing for Modern Applications \| Casco	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casco.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Autonomous Security Testing for Modern Applications \| Casco	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cascohq.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Autonomous Security Testing for Modern Applications \| Casco	en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanctumai.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	SanctumAI — The identity control plane for autonomous AI agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0eroshot.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	ZeroShot — Offensive Security Testing for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
nebrasapps.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	NebrasApps.com - AI Security Officer for Continuous Compliance	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
synapdome.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	SynapDome \| The Neural Shield for Enterprise Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
averta.io ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Agentic AI Security: The AI Agent Operating System \| Averta	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usegruve.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	AI Security & Infrastructure for Enterprise \| Gruve	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demipass.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	DemiPass — Secrets management for the agentic era	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joingruve.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	AI Security & Infrastructure for Enterprise \| Gruve	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lumoscloud.ai ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	AI Security & Infrastructure for Enterprise \| Gruve	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.