similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to useberry.com

Useberry alternatives & similar sites

UX Research & Usability Testing Platform – Useberry — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Design And Html →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
badusability.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Bad Usability — collected by Netlife Research	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deluxeretail.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Deluxe \| Usability Study Results	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usabilityforafrica.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	home	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aditiphatak.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	ADITI PHATAK – Researcher · Designer · Developer	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
platformparity.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Intro: The Platform And a Stylesheet \| Really Good Software Docs	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usabilityviews.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Usability Views - 11,002 articles about usability, accessibility, IA, HCI and web design	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
adambweinberger.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Adam Weinberger – UXR \| Psychologist \| Dad	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abraham.io ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Latest Posts – Abraham.io	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baibase.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	baibase – A good product sharing website	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lukeberrypi.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Luke Berry	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derivadow.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Derivadow – Thoughts and observations on the open web, linked data, URIs and generally how technology and design can create great things for people to use.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sameerrane.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Sameer Rane – Notes, observations, and work related notes	en	web-design-and-html WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designsystemproblems.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Design System Problems \| Practical guides for solving common design system challenges	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lukemedical.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Free App Template - Jupiter X Lite	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joannelindesign.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Joanne Lin, Product Designer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samsonayeni.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Samson Ayeni – Transform Your Ideas Into A Digital Symphony	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abluegreengalaxy.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	A Blue Green Galaxy – Explore the future of accessibility with A Blue Green Galaxy.	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joaquindespontin.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Joaquin Despontin \| Product & UX Designer Portfolio	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.