similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to usabilityfails.com

Usabilityfails alternatives & similar sites

usabilityfail.orgusabilityfail.org — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
usabilityfail.com ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	usabilityfail.orgusabilityfail.org	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
askus.at ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ask:us – Wir gestalten mit - Ein Service von AIT	AT de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
headnews.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Eine dynamische Quelle vielfältiger Inhalte	DE de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digiversity.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	digiversity — Webmagazin für Informationstechnologie in den Geisteswissenschaften	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luxe-pulse.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Luxe Pulse – Innovative Technologie-Trends hautnah erleben und verstehen	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neureif.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	neureif \| Digitale Lösungen aus dem Familienalltag	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitallyworld.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Home - digitallyworld.org	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zweitvolt.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Zweitvolt – Battery Engineering, BMS & Testsysteme	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
inclusion-tech-lab.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Teilhabe durch Technologie - Inclusion Tech Lab	DE de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
basicthinking.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Startseite – BASIC thinking	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joshuakunz.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Joshua Kunz \| DevOps Portfolio	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luminous-rails.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Luminous Rails – Smarter Durchblick für Hamburgs Tech-Szene	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digitalkompass.net ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	DigitalKompass \| Mirko Peters - M365 Specialist \| Substack	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developher.dev ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	developHER \| Tech-Events von OTTO	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
datendschungel.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Datendschungel - Dein unabhängiges Magazin für Technologie, Digital-Trends und IT-Wissen	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ind-technik.de ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Ingenieurbüro IND - Dr.-Ing. Peer Dahl	DE de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
depinshop.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	DEPINSHOP - Premium DePIN Geräte & Web3 Hardware Marketplace	US~ de	technology-and-computing Shopify	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developbyter.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Developbyter Blog – Technik-News, Tutorials und Projekte	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.