Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to uralsezer.com

Ural Sezer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
artiu.dev
Artur Oborski | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
boluwatife.dev
Bolu Adetifa
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
guilleperez.com
Guillermo Pérez - Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
kwiatek.dev
Patryk Kwiatek
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
teteewansoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Tete Ewan Software Java Developers
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
kunok.dev
kunokdev
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
andy-yates-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
Andy Yates, Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
arrebol.io
Arrebol - IT
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
inwarsoft.com
Inwarsoft
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
nextricssoftware.com
Nextrics Software Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
kunalraj.dev
Kunalraj Singh
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
arjunmandair.com
Arjun Mandair — Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
aalmamun.me
Abdullah Al Mamun — Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
abigailthompson.net
Abigail Thompson
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
bonura.dev
Diego Bonura
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
somar.dev
Somar Aani | Freelance Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
softdio.com
Softdio – Software Development Studio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
andrewstout.dev
Andrew Stout - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.