similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to upfork.com

Upfork alternatives & similar sites

UpFork! | This is the personal site of Simon Greenwold, a software developer and engineering manager. Why the red fork in the sky? Why not? — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
johnuhri.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	John Uhri – Software Engineering Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
urielsalis.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Uriel Salischiker - Engineering Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zrehman.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Zia Ur Rehman \| Software Engineering Manager	US~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
saltares.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	David Saltares · Engineering Leadership & Software Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandromartinez.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Sandro E. Martínez \| Systems Engineer, Full Stack Developer & Software Development Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lunarhacker.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Lunar Hacker – Fractional Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joelolawanle.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Joel Olawanle - Software Engineer and Developer Advocate	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
josebmendozam.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jose Mendoza — Software Developer & Engineering Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derekxwang.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Derek X Wang - Software engineer, maker, and founder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joekarlsson.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Joe Karlsson \| Software Engineer & Developer Advocate	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
naseraleisa.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Naser Aleisa - Software developer and troubleshooter	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sutaj.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Personal Website \| Fullstack Software Engineer & DevOps Engineer \| personal website	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diegocosta.me ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Diego Costa - Engineering Manager, Senior Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
federicoterzi.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Federico Terzi - A Software Engineering Journey	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lukewh.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Lukewh - Engineering Manager	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devbriefs.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	devbriefs - Posts on engineering, product, and developer tools	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luminadrift.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	John Durcan \| Personal Portfolio, Mobile MVP Developer & iOS Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sweber.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Seya Weber - Project Manager & Software Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.