similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to uilicensing.com

Uilicensing alternatives & similar sites

The University of Iowa Trademark Licensing Program | The University of Iowa — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Law →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
epiaf.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	e-PIAF \| Faculty of Law \| University of Basel	en	law TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oneidacountytraffic.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Traffic Diversion Program for Oneida County \| Traffic Diversion Program	United States~ en	law SilverStripe	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ericruchensky.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Eric Ruchensky - Flagstaff, Arizona, Creighton University, Sandra Day O’Connor College of Law, Arizona State University \| about.me	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bailhotlineuniversity.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Log In ‹ Bail Hotline University — WordPress	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vlslawtuition.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Law Tuition center – Tuition Center for University of London LLB and A-Levels Law	en	law WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bartoncenter.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Barton Child Law and Policy Center – Emory University School of Law	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medibasesiuhdatabreachsettlement.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Santiago et al. v. Staten Island University Hospital - Home	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
barcovid19.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Collaboratory – On Legal Education and Licensing for Practice	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dasafedriving.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Walker County District Attorneys Office - Defensive Driving Program	United States~ en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hemisphereip.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Hemisphere IP - Patents, Trademarks, and Intellectual Property	en	law	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
sprucelawcourse.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Spruce Law Course – Student Pre-University Court Exposure	en	law WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
familylawsolutionsofiowa.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Des Moines Iowa Family Law Attorneys \| Family Law Solutions of Iowa	en	law WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
virginiatrialfirm.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Cantor Grana Buckner Bucci \| The Virginia Trial Firm \| Richmond Va	en	law WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annapoggi.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Sito Documenti Anna Poggi \| Professore ordinario di Diritto Pubblico – Università degli Studi di Torino	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annabelmoorelaw.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Estate Planning and Probate Lawyer \| The Law Office of Annabel Moore	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
familylegalgroup.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Attorney-at-Law in San Diego, CA \| The Law Office of Mark A. Reed	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
bailtruth.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BailTruth – The unfairness of the cash bail system	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elap.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Eastside Legal Assistance Program	en	law WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.