similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to trustlabel.at

Trustlabel alternatives & similar sites

Gütesiegel, Onlineshop, Zertifikat, Shop, Website, Plattform, Internetplattform, Webseite, zertifizieren, ecommerce, trust, Gütezeichen — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Business →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
internethandel.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	INTERNETHANDEL – Das Magazin für E-Commerce	DE de	business	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
active-elite.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Startseite - Winter E-Commerce Agentur	de	business WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avantrado.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Willkommen bei Avantrado \| E-Commerce Partner	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenomedien.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Shopify Agentur aus Köln \| Shopify Partners \| Keno Medien	DE de	business WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gripsintelligence.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Grips - Daily Online and Offline Product Sales Measurement	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7pxl.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	7pxl - DSGVO-konforme Kurzlinks & QR-Codes für Unternehmen	de	business	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccepmep.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	MEP - Marketing Experience Platform	de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ifeedback.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Feedback messen, analysieren – Umsatz optimieren \| iFEEDBACK®	DE de	business WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decify.ai ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Decify: Mehr Umsatz und Gewinn mit Antworten direkt von deinen Kunden.	de	business WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
unternehmens-profil.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Google-Unternehmensprofil optimieren lassen / Anton Reimer	de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
icosmedia.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Startseite - IcosMedia	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
klarheit-und-drive.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	klarheit & drive \| Positionierung und Marke für Dein Unternehmen	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
loyalista.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Loyalista - Loyalitätsprogramm für Ihr Unternehmen	DE de	business	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csr-reportings.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	CSR Berichtspflicht, Nachhaltigkeitsbericht erstellen, CSR Report	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
internetcops.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Prinz Connect \| Advice & Network	DE de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
customer-centricity.org ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	customer-centricity.org - © Caroline Schliephake	de	business WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uplift-netzwerk.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Uplift-Netzwerk: Wir verbinden Kompetenzen für Ihren Erfolg am POS - uplift-Netzwerk	de	marketing-and-advertising Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inter-check.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Intercheck - Brand Name Testing Survey - Brand Check	DE de	business	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.