Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to troyruss.com

Troy | Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
ignaciocab.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
76match
siyuli.dev
Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
74match
evan-shaw.com
Evan Shaw | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
nalinporwal.com
Nalin's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
balazshorvath.net
Balazs Horvath | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
angelicasportfolio.com
Angelica's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
abdulrehmanchoudhry.tech
Abdul Rehman Choudhry | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
renepauls.com
René Pauls Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
deontevanterpool.com
Deonté Vanterpool | Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
kierancr.com
Kieran Cripps | Portfolio Shell
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
albertxlynch.com
Albert Lynch Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
anushree.cloud
Portfolio_Anushree
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
andrewreedhall.com
Andrew Hall's Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
chazarvizu.com
Chaz's Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
alexgrimm.dev
Personal Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
2daysnews.net
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
adarshd.dev
Adarsh Divakaran | Portfolio - REPL
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
arbitrarylogic.dev
Next.js Portfolio Starter
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.