similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to troikatech.com

Troikatech alternatives & similar sites

Troika Tech | Ruby and JS in the streets, Haskell and friends between the sheets. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
rubystacknews.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Linking Ruby knowledge from the most remote places in the world. – Independent Ruby & Rails publication for engineers and technical leaders worldwide	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotlang.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	dotLang \| A minimal but powerful programming language based on C, Go and Haskell	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rubaniuk.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Code and Coda \| Blog by Andrei Rubaniuk.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drfirdousawan.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ICE786 Blog \| We train the people	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rubykoans.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Learn Ruby with the Edgecase Ruby Koans	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotnetcodr.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Exercises in .NET with Andras Nemes \| Tips and tricks in C# .NET	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rubyrailroad.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Ruby Railroad \| A software develepor's programming adventures in Ruby on Rails, Open Source, and Computer Science	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ruby-doc.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Ruby-Doc.org: Documenting the Ruby Language	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rubytoolbox.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Ruby Toolbox - Know your options!	en	programming-languages	robots llms ai humans	emailphone	none
rubyguides.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Ruby Guides, Tutorials & Reference \| RubyGuides	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ruby-toolbox.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The Ruby Toolbox - Know your options!	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helvm.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	☀️ HelVM - Haskellish Esoteric Language VM implemented in Haskell \| Haskellish Esoteric Language VM	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
developingthedeveloper.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Developing the developer - Write clean code and keep it simple.	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dore.tech ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Dore.tech \| dore.tech	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
charm-ruby.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Charm Ruby - Glamorous Terminal Libraries for Ruby	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
checkio.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CheckiO - coding games and programming challenges for beginner and advanced	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rubykin.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Teach Kids Ruby	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stroustrup.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Bjarne Stroustrup's Homepage	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.