similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to trigosec.com

Trigosec alternatives & similar sites

trigosec: engineering for trust-critical systems — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
icalia.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	ICALIA SYSTEMS - Security Engineering & Red Team	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dotimg.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	SSE – Secure Systems Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
3accents.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Three Accents Consulting LLC \| C4 & Cyber Systems Engineering (SDVOSB)	US~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
d-cryptor.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Cybersecurity \| ST Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gaadhhaye.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Gepco Engineering Companies —	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
stofu.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	SToFU Systems \| Cybersecurity, Security Certification, and Systems Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
detectionengineering.io ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Detection Engineering Maturity Matrix	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abrahamkhan.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Abraham Khan \| Computer Engineering Student - Real-Time Systems, Embedded & Data	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hexasec.cloud ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	HexaSec \| PCI DSS Compliance & iGaming Systems Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hglass.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Hunter Glass \| Cybersecurity & I&C Engineering	US~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xsha.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	0xSHA · Security Research & Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
accoladec.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Accolade Engineering Consultancy Services	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
abnerpallichan.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Abner Pallichan \| Security Systems Engineer	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcicgroup.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcicgroup.co.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcic-group.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qcic-group.co.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Global security engineering company \| QCIC Security Assured	GB en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
subtleengineeringgroup.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	SUBTLE ENGINEERING GROUP, LLC	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.