Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to torgillespie.com

Tor Gillespie - Web Apps & Projects · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
irarudnick.com
My Web Projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
rokcej.com
Web Projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
kuprukengineering.com
KDE - Projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andyhodgetts.com
My Portfolio - Web Development Projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
fathsolution.com
Fatah Projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
thersprojects.com
the RS PRojects
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
studiohark.co.uk 🇬🇧
projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
nibnut.com
Custom Web Apps | nibnut
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
angelabewick.dev
Angela's Projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
erprojects.in 🇮🇳
Er. Projects Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
rkvnova.com
RKV Nova - Web Development, AI Training & Project Solutions
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
adnanskopljak.com
Adnan Skopljak | Web Developer | Portfolio & Projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
albertcheng-projects.com
Albert Cheng Projects
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
dluisnothere.com
Code Projects | Di Lu
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
pingybot.com
Bytegears - Websites & Web applications
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
solvobit.com
Bytegears - Websites & Web applications
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
roboboats.com
KenWebProjects
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
artkod.com
Artkod - web application development
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.