Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to topspotpublishing.com

Top Spot Publishing · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
terrytoler.com
BeHoldings Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
kflgallery.com
Tarragon Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
alexparkerpublishing.com
Alex Parker Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
eulipionpublishing.com
Eulipion Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
renelamartre.com
René La Martre Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
reneefreyauthor.com
A4A Publishing Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
malleuspublishing.com
Malleus Publishing - Home
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
1kfaces.com
Thousand Faces Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
4oakbooks.com
4 Oak Books – Independent Publisher
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
glendambo.com
Glendambo Publishing (Anthony Bruce)
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
2ning.net
The Great Bear & Pleiades Publishing
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
demo-03.com
Horizon Publishing | Books That Inspire
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
malorienilson.com
Malorie Nilson – Publisher | Editor
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
andthenwhathappened.net
And Then What Happened Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
simonsiabod.com
Simon Siabod Publishing - Contemporary Fiction
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
igneousbooks.com
Igneous Books – Publishing Quality Genre Fiction
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
cheeseballpublishin.com
Cheeseball Publishin | Indie Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
kidsandadultkidsbooks.com
About Us - Denise Doraisamy Publishing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.