Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to tomporkka.com

Tom Porkka · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
mathiesen.dev
Writing | Jarle Mathiesen
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
nevryk.com
Nevryk Soliven — Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
roalts.com
Raghav Apoorv — Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
aryankhurana.com
Home | Aryan Khurana
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
sooditk.dev
Soodit Kumar - Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
guillermovalin.com
Guillermo Valin — Software Engineer & Technology Leader
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
aiforwarddeployedengineer.com
Hugo Parreão — AI Forward Deployed Engineer
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
aroramrinaal.com
Mrinaal Arora | Software Engineer Portfolio and Projects
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
cobanov.dev
Mert Cobanov
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
benjaminrcollins.com
Benjamin Collins Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
guidotto.dev
Giacomo Guidotto
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
andrewaxelrod.dev
Andrew Axelrod
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
ben-irastorza.dev
Ben Irastorza | Portfolio Website
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
0xjck.com
0xjck
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
adamscottryals.com
A. Scott Ryals | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
rogerdavidcruz.com
Roger Cruz Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
acsresultsai.net
Alex Seisler | Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
bidwot.dev
Bidwot — Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.