Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to tomkane.dev

tomkane · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
andrewbrott.com
Andrew Brott – Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
theoneeclarin.com
Theone Eclarin | Homepage
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
alexschembri.com
Alex Schembri
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
arielholstein.com
Ariel Holstein
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
guilhermeabel.com
Home | Guilherme Abel
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
laamvr.com
Victor Laam
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
rohanvaidya.com
Rohan Vaidya
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andrewmullins.dev
Andrew Mullins Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
andyleeproject.dev
Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
ankit.tech
Home | Ankit Gupta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
fanniebarskhian.com
Fannie Barskhian | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
alex-chen.dev
alex chen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
abhisheksachan94.com
Portfolio | Creative Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
4anc.net
BakinoGor — DevOps / SRE track
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
masonstahl.com
Mason Stahl
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
bobpham.com
Bob Pham - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rocky-production.com
Brian Ruiz | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
rogutkuba.com
Kuba Rogut
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.