Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to timferrari.com

Tim Ferrari | Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
arlwinf.com
Arlwin Fajardo | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
fathiputera.com
Fathi Putera | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ankurraj.tech
Ankur Raj | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
codisim.com
Waliullah | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
arghadeepdas.com
Arghadeep Das | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
coghilldev.com
Software Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
fibuklarx.com
Wahid Aliyar | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
krislito.com
Kris Lito | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
kyleknaggs.com
Kyle Knaggs | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
maxluong.dev
Max Luong | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
arjundhaliwal.com
Arjun Dhaliwal | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
donvu.dev
Don Vu | Software Developer Page
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
bogdanraicu.dev
Bogdan Raicu | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
codefaheem.com
Faheem - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewgordon.dev
Andrew Gordon | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
balasanthosh.dev
Bala Santhosh | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
software-developer-india.com
Home | Software Developer India
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.