Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to timdyson.com

Tim Dyson — Designer & Design Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
artbyade.com
Aloba Adewale — Multidisciplinary Designer & Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
77match
boraalap.com
Bora Alap - Product Design & Design Engineering
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
bhavyasehgal.com
Bhavya Sehgal – Product Designer & Design Engineer | Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
bockaronson.com
Max Bock-Aronson — Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
arturmineev.com
Artur Mineev — Design Manager | Product Design & Fintech
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
asafsimantov.com
Asaf Siman Tov · Principal Product Designer & Design Systems Lead
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
ascreativedesign.com
Andy Simpson — Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
matteomule.com
matteomule • product design engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
kuriouscreator.com
Kayla Harris · Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
maulanafaa.com
Maulana Farhan – Senior Product Designer & UI/UX Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
arkadiuszpalki.com
ARKADIUSZ PALKI — Design Engineer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
inzamamahmad.com
Inzamam Ahmad - DevOps Engineer & Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
benlister.net
Ben Lister — product designer focused on design systems
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
arttrec.com
Cleanwell Mwalwanda — Designer & Developer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
mateuszwojdas.com
Mateusz Wojdas — UX/UI Designer & Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
beijin.me
Bei Jin — Lead Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
arminabaye.com
Your Name — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
bilalhportfolio.org
Bilal Hatim — Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.