Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to timcheeseman.com

Tim Cheeseman · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
andrewmarkle.com
Andrew Markle · Andrew Markle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
integrisweb.com
Doing It Wrong – learn in public
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
thelondoncoder.com
The London Coder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andywhittle.dev
Andy Whittle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bengunson.me
Hi, I'm Bennett
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewtatham.com
Andrew Tatham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
codeatcpp.com
Code @ C++
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
argindev.com
Tolga Argin | argindev.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
armannvg.com
armannvg
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewtheguy.com
Andrew Chen — passionate coder, classical music lover, special food maker
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
nevezhyn.com
Roman Nevezhyn
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
berinfontes.me
Bernardo Fontes (Berin)
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
albertlatacz.com
Making software happen…
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
softwaredevelopmenthell.com
Software Development Hell
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
codedaplanet.com
code.da.planet – Software development (AKA coding) is changing the world!
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
doctorsourcecode.com
Dr. Source Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
maxburson.com
Max Burson
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
aesthetecoding.io
Aesthete coding, Easy to code, hard to master
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.