Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to timboerner.com

Brnr | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
83match
divyanshusoni.com
Divyanshu Soni | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
83match
rohangore.com
Rohan Gore - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
83match
sonofuri.dev
SonofURI | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
alexiwisteria.dev
Alex Lee | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
rizkyzhang.com
Home | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
andrewbadams.com
Andrew Adams | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
82match
abhishekpandey.tech
Abhishek Pandey | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
iordneto.com
Iord Neto — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
pierres.dev
Pierre Smith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
romitsagu.com
Romit Sagu | Software Engineering
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
matyasfodor.com
Matyas Fodor Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
alexswensen.io
Alexander Swensen | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
rockymunoz.com
Rocky | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
krissolui.com
Kris Lui | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
mayurzala.com
Mayur Zala - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
rodrigopsasaki.com
Rodrigo Sasaki - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
ahmedyassin.dev
Ahmed Yassin | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kylekerlew.com
Kyle Kerlew | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.