Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to tiffanylea.com

Home - Tiffany Lea May · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
pixelscalepro.com
Home - Pixelscalepro
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andrewjohnson.dev
Resume - Andrew A. Johnson - Lead Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
matrulko.io
Home - Matrulko
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
krislovett.com
Home - Kris Lovett
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
benmacdonald.me
Ben MacDonald | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
abrahamgr.dev
Abraham Galindo | Staff Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
phyozinwai.com
Phyo Zin Wai - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
fedeq.dev
Portfolio Federico Quattrocchio - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
benjaminjeschke.com
Benjamin Jeschke
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
arianhadi.dev
Arian Hadi | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mchafizdev.com
Muhammad Chaerul Hafiz — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
arjanjassal.com
Arjan Jassal
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
2mio.com
Artem Poliukhovych | CV
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
gsheerey.com
Gurkirt Heerey — Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
alexej-liebenthal.dev
Alexej Liebenthal - Engineering & Beyond
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
robindykema.com
Robin Dykema — Staff Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
billsearle.me
Bill Searle - Senior Front End Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
bmeen.dev
bMeen | Frontend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.