Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to tiernanwatson.com

Tiernan Watson | Game Programming Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
bobthegamebuilder.com
Volodymyr Komarov - Game Programmer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
maxrichman.com
Max Richman | Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
kuzeyonder.com
Young Game Developer | Vibe Coding Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
matthewka.com
Matthew Anderson - Game Producer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
thesidgames.com
Sid's Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
mateuszfigura.com
Mateusz Figura | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
mateuszmotylinski.com
Mateusz Motylinski - Game Programming & Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
grusso94.com
Giacomo Russo | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
masq-games.com
Masq - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
adityasinnghh.dev
Aditya Singh - Gaming Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
arrakh.com
Arya Rakha || Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
newtsworkshop.com
CuriousNewt | Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
benmorris.dev
Ben Morris Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
maxtrest.com
Max Trest - Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
adambilbaeno.dev
Adam Bilbaeno — Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
kusionowicz.com
Mateusz Kusionowicz - Game Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
piotrtekien.com
Piotr Tekień - Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
guillaume-cailhe.com
Guillaume Cailhe - Gamedev portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.