Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thrill-project.com

Thrill-Project | The colorful side of code. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
thescienceofcode.com
The Science of Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
thelanguageofcode.com
The Language of Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
pieceofcode.com
Piece of code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
thesmoggiecoder.com
All posts | The Smoggie Coder
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
fastware.dev
At the speed of code | Amaury Séchet | Substack
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
invadethecode.com
Home | Invade the Code 👽
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
masongup.com
Shiny Nuggets of Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bhargavpatel.dev
Bhargav Patel – The Code Architect
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewmartinez.dev
Home | The Shade
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
themcglonecode.com
The McGlone Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alexander-peterson.net
Projects of Alexander Peterson
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
gruvw.com
Gruvw | Coding projects website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
mattslay.com
Matt Slay, PhC | Doctor of Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
thesenator.dev
HOME | The Senator
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thesourcecodegirl.com
The Source Code Girl
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
benc.dev
Pulse Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
artisanalbytes.com
Artisanal Bytes | The Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
fasciism.com
fASCIIsm: For the Love of Text
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.