Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thomaur.dev

Thomas Lamars | FE Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
mattoliver.dev
Matt Oliver Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
mazereeuw.dev
Cas Mazereeuw - Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
nickabate.dev
nickabate.dev - backend developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
newbiedev.com
Newbie Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
andrewpauluhn.dev
AWP Developer Blog
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
ashleyhylton.com
Ashley Hylton | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
andrewrobles.dev
Andrew Robles | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
annawallstrom.com
Anna Wallström - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
felipegte.com
CET Developer | FelipeGTe
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
bingfei.me
Andy's blog | Web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
nevuto.dev
Nevuto Developers
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
4devs.app
Online Developer Tools
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
mattkwon.com
Matthew Kwon | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
alexnicholas.dev
Alex Nicholas | Front-End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
arjungovindan.com
Arjun Govindan | Fullstack Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
matteocolucci.com
Matteo Colucci - Full-stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
bidev.me
BI Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
armchairdevs.com
Armchair Developers
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.