Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thomasgweiser.com

Thomas G. Weiser – Autor · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
isabelnatter.com
isabel natter – autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
79match
irenereiserer.com
irenereiserer.com – Autorin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
ninavell.com
Nina Vell
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
thomasknuewer.com
Thomas Knüwer | Autor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ninawylie.com
Nina Wylie – Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
l-kus-autor.com
L. Kus - Autorenwebsite
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
nikapecunia.com
Nika Pecunia – Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
doerte-jensen.com
Doerte Jensen – Autorin
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
dominik-meier.com
Dominik A. Meier – Autor und Schreibcoach
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
aeraofgods.org
Markus Heitz – Autor & Kreativer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
nielsodegaard.com
Niels Ødegaard – Autor & Lebemann
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
sophie-sumburane.com
Sophie Sumburane – Autorin, Redakteurin
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
autorin-jennifer-birkenkamp.com
autorin-jennifer-birkenkamp.com – Autorin aus Leidenschaft
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
kylaloo.com
kylaloo.net – Eine queere Autorenseite
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
andrewegmann.com
André Wegmann
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
felixmeran.com
Felix Meran | Autor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
laetitiaahrens.com
Autor: Laetitia Ahrens – Ebozon Verlag
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
nick-stein.com
Nick Steins Bücher – Was er so schreibt
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.