Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thomascaneday.com

Thomas Caneday | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
alexcali.me
Alex Cali | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andybangs.dev
Andy Bangs | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
alexiwisteria.dev
Alex Lee | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
mawburn.com
Matt Burnett | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
rockymunoz.com
Rocky | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
kzotos.com
Kostas Zotos | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
pirooz.dev
Pirooz Ekhtiyari | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
rjlaasish.com
Aasish Rijal | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abhinavranjith.dev
Abhinav Ranjith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kylekerlew.com
Kyle Kerlew | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ankitapatil.dev
Ankita Patil | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
divyanshusoni.com
Divyanshu Soni | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
pierres.dev
Pierre Smith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewbadams.com
Andrew Adams | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
angusblomley.com
Angus Blomley - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
aaronpetcoff.me
Aaron Petcoff, software engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kushagrakiyawat.com
Kushagra Kiyawat | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
mazenabdul.com
⚡️ Mazen Abdul | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.