Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thezanke.com

Alex Howard - Giant Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
dkprog.com
Daniel Koch - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
79match
andrewnbishop.com
Andrew Bishop – Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
77match
abhinavcodes.tech
Abhinav Anand | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
fatihakdogan.com
Fatih Akdoğan | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
andrewxu.tech
Andrew Xu | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
mateuszsuchon.com
Mateusz Suchoń - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
alex256.com
Alex Kaluzhny | Full Stack Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
74match
ashokj.app
Ashok J — Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
74match
alexmp.dev
Alexander MP
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
nhdez.com
Nelson Hernandez Casanova - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
ahmadyousufi.dev
Ahmad Ozair Yousufi — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
kubar.dev
Jakub Rusinowicz - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
farkie.dev
Farkie – Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
8qbit.me
8qBIT | qLabs Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
abey.dev
Abey Thomas - Software Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
arthurvedana.com
Arthur Vedana
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
iosdmait.com
IOSD - International Organization of Software Developers
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
mattilamikko.com
Mikko Mattila | Software developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.