Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thethingaboutausten.com

The Thing About Austen | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
solriax.com
Solriax | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
74match
clhwindsor.com
clhwindsor.com | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
pilcrowmag.com
PILCROW | Tom Watters | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
thelongunbecoming.com
The Long Unbecoming | Tim Regan-Porter | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
robfike.com
Fike's Substack | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
thekyg.com
KYG Stories | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
beverlylandersonnews.com
The Phoenix Codex | Beverly L. Anderson | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
rodsfictionbooks.com
Rod’s Fiction Universe | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
mayonnaisepress.com
Mayonnaise Press News | C.D. Truncheon | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
71match
bloodandmorality.com
Blood and Morality | Vital Remnants | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
thenarrowestalley.com
THE NARROWEST ALLEY | Bob Nease | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
70match
bookauntie.com
Love, Your Book Auntie | Julia Vee | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
69match
booksundone.com
Books Undone by Livia J. Elliot | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
theosmosisofflesh.com
Osmosis of Flesh | Selene' Graves Erotica | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
68match
inspiredbyausten.com
Inspired By Austen | Jane Austen Blog
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
bonuscorey.com
Corey Ryan Forrester’s Rants and Such! | Substack
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
dougjohnstone.com
Doug Johnstone | writing about stuff
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
nickastor.com
is write – Writing about crime writing
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.