Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thesecuritybench.com

The Security Bench · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
thesecuritypath.com
The Security Path
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
75match
thesecurityresearch.com
The Security Research
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
74match
bluesecurityops.com
Blue Security Ops
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
absec.org
AB Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
3qsecurity.com
3Q Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
3qsecurity.io
3Q Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
fdsecuritygroup.com
FD Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
nicenesecurity.com
Nicene Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
73match
ns-security.co.uk 🇬🇧
NS Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
blueicesec.org
BLUEICE Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
360security.me
360 Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
cmcsec.com
CMC Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
bit-security.co.uk 🇬🇧
BIT SECURITY
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
ssgsecurity.co.uk 🇬🇧
SSG Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
securityblues.co.uk 🇬🇧
Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
7minutesecurity.com
7 Minute Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
7minsec.com
7 Minute Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
72match
bluehivesecurity.com
BlueHive Security
1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.