Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to thescienceofcode.com

The Science of Code · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
artandscienceofcoding.com
art and science of coding
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
75match
pieceofcode.com
Piece of code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
thelanguageofcode.com
The Language of Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mcguirev10.com
Forty Years of Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
gtcameron.com
Cameron Codes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
dkucs.com
DKU Computer Science Club
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
labofcoding.com
Lab of Coding
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
masongup.com
Shiny Nuggets of Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
fastware.dev
At the speed of code | Amaury Séchet | Substack
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
networksciencelab.com
My Little Network Science Lab
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
fardeenrahman.com
Fardeen Rahman - Bachelor of Computer Science
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
meekcode.com
Meek Code
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
softwareengineerings.com
Software Engineerings: Learn, Build, and Innovate | software engineerings
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
docodethatmatters.com
Do Code That Matters
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
0not.net
0not -- Programming, hacking, making, and science.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mattslay.com
Matt Slay, PhC | Doctor of Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
alexvilvert.net
Alex Vilvert - Computer Science Professor
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
softwarecodex.dev
The Software Codex - Software Codex
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.