Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to theprojectyard.com

The Project Yard · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
theprojectsomething.com
the project:SOMETHING
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
softfictionprojects.com
Soft Fiction Projects
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
billtallchief.com
BILL-TALLCHIEF-PROJECT
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
thesentienceprotocol.com
The Sentience Protocol
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
theproudpinkballoon.com
The Proud Pink Balloon
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
theperfectauthor.com
The Perfect Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
theprimordialcode.com
The Primordial Code
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
theperfectrevenge.com
- The Perfect Revenge
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
thepoepapers.com
The Poe Papers
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
thekittyhawkproject.com
The KittyHawk Project | Leaving my Dayton, to find my KittyHawk
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
thememorybrigade.com
The Memory Brigade
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
thepiratess.com
The Piratess Historical Fiction Novel
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
theprintsofapauper.com
The Prints of a Pauper
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
theshowtellproject.com
The Show Tell Project – Words for the Warrior and Other Stories
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
a-scarlet-cord.com
The Prince and His Assasin
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
niamhcalderwood.com
Niamh Calderwood – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
niatheauthor.com
Nia the Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
nicoleopongagyare.com
Nicole Opong-Agyare – Fiction Writer
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.